- General Comments
- Site was easily accessible and located directly off of Washington Street (Route 127). Parking was available at a convenience store to the northeast of the site.
- Operation Plan
- Yes
- Operation Comments
- It appears that the operational purpose of Gloucester-01A was for incremental restoration and flood protection purposes. It can be incrementally opened to enable increased tidal flushing with the ability to be completely closed before a storm. It appears that the operational purpose of Gloucester-01B was two-fold: 1) It could be installed towards the invert of the headwall and be incrementally opened to enable restoration while enable outward passage of stormwater flows and mitigating flood potential from the tides. 2) It could be installed at the high position to act as a high level barrier to storm surge while allowing stormwater out the bottom. It appeared that Gloucester-01C was installed for the sole purpose of flood protection and stormwater conveyance. It appears that this trio of tide gates was recently installed and configured in 2011 and are being actively managed to enable upstream restoration.
- Gate Comments
- There were three tide gates at the site. Gloucester-01A was an old sluice gate with a manual jack screw located at the bottom of the eastern portion of the headwall. It was open approximately 2’ at the time of the site visit. Gloucester-01B was a newer combination metal sluice / flap gate. The sluice gate was able to operated via jack screw to be installed either at the invert of the headwall or towards the top. It was located towards the top of the headwall during the site visit, enabling low level tidal flushing through the bottom opening. Gloucester-01C was a metal flap gate installed in the middle portion of the headwall (i.e., Gloucster-01B could be located either above or below Gloucester-01C) (see field notes for diagram). All three of the tide gates appeared to be in good condition at the time of the site visit. Gloucester-01A was rusty, but corrosion was not evident and it appeared that the manual gear had recently been maintained and greased.
- Elevation Comments
- Staining was apparent on the upstream (U/S) and downstream (D/S) ends of the headwall (HW) so approximate extent of U/S and D/S tidal influence was able to be assessed in addition to tide gate (TG) invert elevations. The below lists measuredowns taken with a surveyors rod and corresponding top of headwall LiDAR elevations (NAVD88 datum).
1a) TG Inv (Gloucester-01A = Gloucester-01B): Top of HW El (D/S) = 7.74’; Inv Measuredown = 12.2’; TG Inv = 7.74’ – 12.2 = -4.46’
1b) TG Inv (Gloucester-01C): Top of HW El (D/S) = 7.74’; Inv Measuredown = 5.00’; TG Inv = 7.74’ – 5.00 = 2.74’
2) Upstream Tidal Influence: Top of headwall LiDAR Elevation = 7.74’; Staining Measuredown = 4.20’; U/S Tidal influence = 7.74 – 4.20 = 3.54’.
3) Downstream Tidal Influence: Top of headwall LiDAR elevation = 7.74’; Staining Measuredown = 3.90’; D/S Tidal Influence = 7.74’ – 3.90’ = 3.84’
- External Data Comments
- US ACOE CENAE-R-2008-2941 Permit 5.11.2009
Mill Pond Operation and Maintenance Plan Revised 8.13.2010
Mill River Tidal Restoration Project Monitoring Summary 7.20.2015