- General Comments
- Site was easily accessible by walking northwards along a paved berm for approximately 500 feet off of Nantasket Road. Next steps: Recommend that a structural and operational assessment of the tide gates and headwall be performed per below comments. Obtain preliminary water level data previously collected at the site.
- Operation Plan
- No
- Operation Comments
- Wooden flap gate is chained open at mouth of headwall. It appears that the flap gate is lowered during anticipated storm surge events for additional protection of upstream area (i.e., emergency closure).
- Gate Comments
- Tide gate is a large wooden flap gate chained in place at the mouth of the culvert. Tide gate appeared to be in good condition. Note there was also a metal sluice gate located upstream of the flap gate (See Hull-02A)
- Elevation Comments
- Staining was apparent on the upstream (U/S) and downstream (D/S) ends of the headwall (HW) so approximate extent of U/S and D/S tidal influence was able to be assessed in addition to tide gate (TG) invert elevations. The below lists measuredowns taken with a surveyors rod and corresponding top of headwall LiDAR elevations (NAVD88 datum).
1) TG Inv (in this case measured to invert of D/S culvert): Top of HW El (U/S) = 13.14’; Inv Measuredown = 16.25’; TG Inv = 13.14 – 16.25 = -3.11’
2) Upstream Tidal Influence: Top of headwall LiDAR Elevation = 5.61’; Staining Measuredown = 2.52’; U/S Tidal influence = 3.69 – 2.52 = 1.17’.
3) Downstream Tidal Influence: Top of headwall LiDAR elevation = 13.14’; Staining Measuredown = 11.55’; D/S Tidal Influence = 13.14’ – 11.55’ = 1.59’
Note: LiDAR was inconsistent on both upstream and downstream headwalls. In order to obtain values, averaged two representative values for each side. Downstream = 12.66’ & 13.62’ = 13.14; Upstream = 5.64’ & 1.74’ = 3.69’