TideGateway

Salem-01A

Salem, Forest River

42.496623, -70.886653

Technical Specifications

Basic Properties

Type
Sluice Gate
Material
Wood
Control
Electric Actuator
Condition
Good
Geometry
Rectangular
Status
Active
Number of Gates
1

Operator & Management

Operator Type
PUBLIC
Operator
City of Salem
Purpose
Flood Protection

Dimensions & Elevations

Dimensions
6ft diameter, 4ft height
Tidal Influence
Upstream: -1.54 NAVD88, Downstream: -0.033 NAVD88

Culvert Details

Restriction Type
Roadway
Geometry
Rectangular
Material
Granite Block
Bottom Material
Sand
Number of Pipes
0
Dimensions
6ft diameter, 4ft height
Condition
Fair
Comments
There were three identical granite block culvert openings on the upstream side (all approximately 6’ wide by 4’ high) and two granite block culvert openings on the downstream side (approximately 10’ wide by 10’ high each). The granite block culvert appeared to be in good condition. Spalling and general deterioration of the upstream headwall was observed. In addition, the cribbing retaining the riprap embankment on the southwest upstream wingwall was collapsing. The downstream headwall appeared to be in good condition; however, sections of the bridge deck were being supported by wooden blocks. A ductile iron water line was observed traversing the downstream side of the bridge.

2024 Field Survey Results

Comprehensive field assessment conducted in 2024

Physical Conditions Assessment

Channel Conditions

Channel Alteration
Limited (<133 ft/acre)
Channel Constriction
Narrower than channel
Channel Erosion
Little (<10% of bank)
Sediment Deposits
None

Blockages & Issues

Debris Blockages
None
Evidence of Overtopping
No

Transect Measurements

50 Yards

Open Water
75
Salt Marsh
14
Brackish
0
Freshwater
0
Ditch
0
Unvegetated
0

150 Yards

Open Water
84
Salt Marsh
11
Brackish
0
Freshwater
0
Ditch
0
Unvegetated
9

300 Yards

Open Water
105
Salt Marsh
29
Brackish
2
Freshwater
0
Ditch
0
Unvegetated
0

Ecological Assessment

Habitat Observations

Crab Burrow Intensity
None
Ponding Depressions
None
Phragmites Present
Limited (<10%)
Ecological Impairment
None

Invasive Species

Upstream Invasive Species
Yes
Downstream Invasive Species
No
Invasive Species Notes
Phragmites along the fringe of the upstream 300ft transects
Additional Comments (2024)
Brackish vegetation in 300ft transect is phragmites. Limited overall restriction.

Historical Records

Legacy data from previous surveys and documentation

Environmental Data

Invasive Species
Yes
Restoration Status
Unknown
Invasive Comments
The marsh immediately upstream appeared to be healthy and was comprised of a mixture of low and high marsh. Multiple invasive striped anemones were observed on the mudflat approximately 100 feet downstream of the downstream bridge opening.

Notes & Comments

General Comments
Site was located on overpass directly off of Route 114. There is a parking turnout at the lead mills conservation area. Floodgates were erected in 1931 (No ch 91 but City of Salem has the 1931 plans). They were reconstructed in 1961 and the sluice gates were replaced in kind in 1963 (#2206 MADEM) constructed by state DPW. The Massachusetts legislature gave approval for town to keep the gates closed on the weekends from June 1-Sept 1. It was approved by the conservation commission on Oct 4, 1979 (found in chapter 593 of the MA state legislature). This was partially to allow for the town to operate a high tide pool area for a local beach which was permitted in 1982. The Corps reviewed the history of the structure in 1990 and determined that the structure was constructed prior to Dec, 18, 1968, which made it eligible for "Grandfathering" under the Nationwide Permits. There were electrical improvements made in 2011.
Operation Plan
No
Operation Comments
Tide gate is manually operated by Salem DPW (i.e., closed) during specific weather events to reduce flooding upstream.
Gate Comments
There were three identical tide gates at this location – Salem-01A was located to the northwest, Salem-01B was located in the middle, and Salem-01C was located to the southeast. The tide gates were all rectangular wooden sluice gates with electric actuators. Access to the tide gates and actuators was limited by a locked chain link fence, so tide gate dimensions are approximate. All three tide gates appeared to be in good condition – the wood was weathered, but did not appear to be rotten and the actuators appeared to have been installed in the last 5-15 years and appeared to be operable.
Elevation Comments
As previously indicated, access to the tide gates was limited by a locked chainlink fence so an invert measuredown could not be obtained. Staining was apparent on the upstream (U/S) and downstream (D/S) ends of the headwall (HW) so approximate extent of U/S and D/S tidal influence was able to be assessed. The below lists measuredowns taken with a surveyors rod and corresponding top of headwall LiDAR elevations (NAVD88 datum). 1) TG Inv – N/A 2) Upstream Tidal Influence: Top of headwall LiDAR Elevation = 2.79’; Staining Measuredown = 4.33’; U/S Tidal influence = 2.79’ – 4.33 = -1.54’. 3) Downstream Tidal Influence: Top of headwall LiDAR elevation = -0.033’; Staining Measuredown = N/A (staining line was flush with retaining wall – see scanned field notes for reference location); D/S Tidal Influence = -0.033’ – 0.00’ = -0.033’ Note: LiDAR was inconsistent on upstream headwall. In order to obtain values, averaged two representative values (3.67’ & 1.9’ = 2.79’). Downstream = 12.66’ & 13.62’ = 13.14; Upstream = 5.64’ & 1.74’ = 3.69’
© 2025 Massachusetts Bays Program. Monitoring tidegates across Massachusetts.