TideGateway

Scituate-01B

Scituate, Scituate Harbor

42.186309, -70.725321

Technical Specifications

Basic Properties

Type
Stop Logs
Material
Wood
Control
Condition
Good
Geometry
Rectangular
Status
Active
Number of Gates
0

Operator & Management

Operator Type
PUBLIC
Operator
Town of Scituate
Permits
Purpose
Other

Dimensions & Elevations

Dimensions
2.58ft diameter, 1.833ft height
Invert Elevation
3.77 NAVD88
Installation Date
Tidal Influence
Upstream: 3.77 NAVD88, Downstream: 5.24 NAVD88

Culvert Details

Restriction Type
Roadway
Geometry
Circular
Material
Concrete
Bottom Material
Number of Pipes
0
Dimensions
1.5ft diameter
Condition
Fair
Comments
The reinforced concrete pipe was in fair condition. It appeared that the mouth of the pipe was beginning to separate from the weir wall on the upstream side of the restriction. In addition, erosion was observed around the upstream concrete weir, presumably from stormwater runoff from the adjacent road, tidal influence, or some combination thereof. Erosion was also observed around the downstream headwall. The downstream headwall was in poor condition and appeared to "leaning" towards the channel towards the top, indicating mobilization of soils behind it. Additionally, spalling of the headwall was observed.

Salt Marsh Field Assessment Results

Comprehensive field assessment data
2024 Field Assessment Protocols →

Physical Conditions Assessment

Channel Conditions

Channel Alteration and Ditching
Moderate (133-398 ft/acre)
Channel Constriction
Narrower than channel
Channel Erosion
Severe (>60% of bank)
Sediment Deposits
Limited (<10% of channel width)

Blockages

Debris Blockages
None
Evidence of Overtopping
Yes

Ecological Assessment

Habitat Observations

Ecological Impairment due to Tide Gate
Moderate
Crab Burrow Intensity
Limited (<10% banks are densely
Ponding and Die-off Depressions
Limited(<10% of marsh platform
Phragmites Present
Limited (<10%)

Invasive Species

Upstream Invasive Species
Yes
Downstream Invasive Species
No
Invasive Species Notes
Phragmites on fringe

General Comments

Lack of low marsh community, early indicators of phragmites encroachment, apparent and apparent lack of sediment exchange supports observations of a moderate tidal restriction.

Habitat Transects

First Transect (50 yards upstream of tide gate)

Second Transect (150 yards upstream of tide gate)

Third Transect (300 yards upstream of tide gate)

Restoration Potential

Restoration prioritization and planning information from MassBays regional coordination

Assessment

Salt Marsh Impairment due to Tidal Restriction
Moderate
Potential Extent of Marsh Restoration
Moderate
Implementation Feasibility
High
Restoration Priority
High
Recommended Improvement Type
O&M and Infrastructure

Notes

Site shows moderate salt marsh impairment due to restricted tidal flow. Replacement with self-regulating tide gate could restore approximately 5-8 acres of degraded marsh habitat. Good access for construction equipment. Regional coordination completed with town DPW and conservation commission.

Historical Records

Legacy data from previous surveys and documentation

Environmental Data

Invasive Species
Yes
Restoration Status
Unknown
Invasive Comments
The impoundment was comprised primarily of high marsh and was fringed by phragmites.
Restoration Comments
Houses were observed around the marsh; however, they appeared to be elevated.
Upstream Area
Salt Marsh: 5-10 acres

Notes & Comments

General Comments
Site is located directly adjacent to Kent Street (busy road). The downstream side is located to the east and the upstream side is located to the west.
Operation Plan
No
Operation Comments
Upstream sluice boards put in seasonally to impound water in marsh for ice skating.
Gate Comments
There were two tidal control structures at the site. A metal flap gate was installed on the downstream portion of the culvert and a concrete weir with wooden stop logs was installed on the upstream portion. The downstream metal flap gate was in poor condition. It was rusted open approximately 3 to 4 inches, the bolts affixing it to the concrete headwall were corroded, and it appeared that someone had attempted to remove the tide gate as evidenced by loosened nuts (i.e., the nuts had been backed off the bolts). The upstream concrete weir and wooden stop logs appeared to be in good condition.
Elevation Comments
Staining was apparent on the upstream (U/S) and downstream (D/S) ends of the headwall (HW) so approximate extent of U/S and D/S tidal influence was able to be assessed in addition to tide gate (TG) invert elevations. The below lists measuredowns taken with a surveyors rod and corresponding top of headwall LiDAR elevations (NAVD88 datum). 1) TG Inv (D/S tide gate): Top of HW El (D/S) = 6.53’; Inv Measuredown = 6.83’; TG Inv = 6.53’ – 6.83 = -0.30’ 2) Upstream Tidal Influence: Top of headwall LiDAR Elevation = 4.43’; Staining Measuredown = 0.66’; U/S Tidal influence = 4.43 – 0.66 = 3.77’. 3) Downstream Tidal Influence: Top of headwall LiDAR elevation = 6.53’; Staining Measuredown = 1.29’; D/S Tidal Influence = 6.53’ – 1.29’ = 5.24’
Visit Comments
Other Comments
Upstream saltmarsh appears to be impacted by septic systems and corn field
External Data Comments
© 2026 Massachusetts Bays Program. Monitoring tidegates across Massachusetts.